MMDA v Bel Air
Village, GR No. 135962, March 27, 2000
Keywords:
Police Power, Neptune Street opening to the public, MMDA claim to have
Facts:
·
30 Dec 1995 – BAVA received a notice from MMDA (dated 22 Dec 1995) through its chairman to open Neptune Street to Traffic.
·
On the same day, respondent was apprised that the perimeter wall
separating the subdivision from the adjacent Kalayaan Avenue would be
demolished.
·
2 Jan 1996 - Respondent prayed for the issuance of a temporary
restraining order and preliminary injunction enjoining the opening of Neptune
Street and prohibiting the demolition of the perimeter wall. The trial court issued a temporary
restraining order the following day.
·
23 Jan 1996 –Preliminary Injunction was DENIED.
·
Pet Rev to CA. CA conducted an ocular inspection.
·
13 Feb 1996 CA issued a writ of preliminary injunction.
·
28 Jan 1997 – CA rendered a Decision finding that the MMDA has no
authority to order the opening of Neptune Street, a private subdivision road
and cause the demolition of its perimeter walls.
·
28 Sept 1998 - The MR filed by MMDA was DENIED
·
Pet Rev to SC by MMDA.
·
MMDA claims that: it has
authority to open Neptune Street bec. MMDA has police power in the delivery of
basic services (regulation of the use of
thorough fares to insure safety, convenience and welfare of the gen. public) in
Metro Manila.
·
MMDA used Sangalang v. IAC: From the premise that it has police
power, it is now urged that there is no need for the City of Makati to enact an
ordinance opening Neptune street to the public.
· Neptune Street is owned by respondent BAVA. It is a private road inside
Bel-Air Village, a private residential subdivision in the heart of the
financial and commercial district of Makati City. It runs parallel to Kalayaan
Avenue, a national road open to the general public. Dividing the two (2)
streets is a concrete perimeter wall approximately fifteen (15) feet high. The
western end of Neptune Street intersects Nicanor Garcia, formerly Reposo
Street, a subdivision road open to public vehicular traffic, while its eastern
end intersects Makati Avenue, a national road. Both ends of Neptune Street are
guarded by iron gates.
Issue: W/N MMDA has the
authority to open Neptune street to public traffic as an agent of the state
endowed with police power.
Ratio: MMDA has no power to
enact ordinances for the welfare of the community. It is the LGUs, acting
through their respective legislative councils, that possess legislative power
and police power.
Ruling: A ‘local government’ is a “political subdivision of a nation or state
which is constituted by law and has substantial control of local affairs”. It
is a “body politic and corporate” – one endowed with powers as a political
subdivision of the National Government and as a corporate entity representing
the inhabitants of its territory (LGC of 1991).
Our
Congress delegated police power to the LGUs in Sec.16 of the LGC of 1991.
It empowers the sangguniangpanlalawigan, panlungsod and bayan to “enact ordinances, approve resolutions and
appropriate funds for the general welfare of the [province, city or
municipality] and its inhabitants pursuant to Sec.16 of the
Code and in the proper exercise of the [LGU’s corporate powers] provided under
the Code.”
There is no
syllable in RA 7924 that grants the MMDA police power, let
alone legislative power. Unlike the legislative bodies of the LGUs, there
is no grant of authority in RA 7924 that allows the MMDA to enact ordinances
and regulations for the general welfare of the inhabitants of Metro
Manila. The MMDA is merely a “development
authority” and not a political unit of government since it is
neither an LGU or a public corporation endowed with legislative power. The MMDA
Chairman is not an elective official, but is merely appointed by the President
with the rank and privileges of a cabinet member.
In sum, the MMDA has no power to enact
ordinances for the welfare of the community. It is the LGUs, acting through their respective legislative
councils, that possess legislative
power and police power.
The SangguniangPanlungsod of Makati City did not
pass any ordinance or resolution ordering the opening of Neptune Street, hence,
its proposed opening by the MMDA is illegal.
No comments:
Post a Comment